

There is a small group of accounts on .ml who keep posting this shit.
This is the first time I’ve ever seen an .mler criticizing this behavior.


There is a small group of accounts on .ml who keep posting this shit.
This is the first time I’ve ever seen an .mler criticizing this behavior.


Both the Nos and the Abstentions are the usual suspects.


2 important things:
This isn’t confusing unless you want it to be.


Okay, here I go: Heavily misleading marketing.
How the fuck do you look at a meat substitute product, which all scream “I AM NOT MEAT, I AM SUBSTITUTE” from the packaging to the naming conventions like “Like-Chicken”, and think this is meat. Please, if you do this, don’t do the shopping for your household. Depending on the language, you might end up with cleaning products in your breakfast cereal.


Let’s rename burgers to heavily processed animal carcasses then :)


Because that’s how substitute products work? I hated meat salami, I love non meat salami. Simple as


This be the type of person to drink Scheuermilch and sue Kinder Schokolade for child cruelty.


Du hast vollkommen Recht :)


This hypothesis of Columbus trying to finance a crusade is heavily contested, to put it mildly.
I think it is trying to frame conflicts as part of a struggle between entities you see in the modern world. Pre-nation-state Europe was waaaayyyyy more divided than united. The entire east vs. West or even Muslim vs. Christianity narrative is accurate in modern times, but pre Napoleon it falls flat.
France had historically seen the ottomans as a preferable partner to England, religion be damned. When the ottomans conquered the Balkans, many Christians even fought on their side. The Austrian slur for Hungarians, Krüzitürken - cross bearing Turks -, reflects that.
Even the now infamous Reconquista wasnt as much of a fight between Islam and Christianity, as it was a power struggle between rulers that sometimes used Religion as a back drop. But alliances and marriages between these ruling families also crossed sectarian borders. The reframing of the Reconquista is a narrative used by Nationalists and not an accurate description of the history of the nebulous West.


They are at war. Russia shoots at civilians. Ukraine shoots at civilians. Both are wrong to shoot at civilians.
South front press just doesnt take issue with Russia shooting at civilians.


While Russia would never ever target civilian targets, nonono, those hospitals were Khamas, you see


Can’t be anything pre Russian revolution then


skirmishes is a nice way to put it. Even after the agreement on the 16th, attacks continued. And whether parts of them collaborate with Israel or not, shooting up their families and burning down their livelihoods is still a crime. Israel is using those crimes as a crowbar to extend their war.


Gentle reminder that al-Sharaa’s troops are currently carrying out massacre against minorities in Suweida


DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT


Da Globalists!!! Da Globo-Homos!!!


And Capitalism will make us all millionaires.


My source is that I made it the fuck up


No, you see, western media is propaganda because they never critique western leaders. This outlet isn’t propaganda because it never critiques Russian leaders.
Guess there are many fakers in .ml