You must be in one of those chinese bullshit farms to not spot the tank

And the pictures you linked are just of charred remains, there is no way to tell if they’re soldiers form the pic. and even if they are, theres only three ppl in those pics. If you want to examine a pic, lets look at this one

Wow you’re really good to Alex-Jones-crisis-actors the victims of this tragedy? Apparently driving a tank counts as unarmed now.

How far away from Tiananmen Square do you think the massacre happened? And how far away is acceptable for it to be called the Tiananmen Square massacre?

You haven’t been around people long enough =P

https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/gw2y6b/the_real_picture_of_tiananmen_square_massacre/

I guess all of those people are just tired

I wish I didn’t see them, but there are streets full of people flattened by tanks =[

http://www.cnd.org/June4th/massacre.html

To end denialism like this is the best reason to keep the article

I’ve seen the tiananmen square pictures, how are you saying that didn’t happen?

I see, and I’m not claiming to have any knowledge, but rather asking for some.

I would advocate to add this information into the article rather than delete it.

If we waited for the CCP to “verify” the info on tiananmen square, we would have no info at all. So it’s expected to have some unverified information in controversial topics.

Thanks for the suggestion, that’s basically what I’ve been doing, but it seems like the only reason ppl are bringing up are around categorizing the incidents differently, e.g. renaming it to Mass_killings_under_totalitarian_regimes. But I don’t see anything about “propaganda” or inaccuracies.

with cryptos all the info you need to the the math is public. In the fiat-sector, everything is secret.

Yeah, If you look at a naive “cost per transaction” of credit cards it seems unbeatable. but that’s only just part of the puzzle. You need to factor in big banks and a bunch of other stuff to start getting the full picture. I’d argue that all armored trucks cost the world more in energy than cryptos, but I haven’t actually crunched the numbers =/

None of these articles ever seem to even attempt to calculate the “energy usage” of fiat currencies 😒

What in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regime is factually incorrect?

I swear my cat crashed GDM once

😻

One possible implementation would be coalescing “single-glyph-responses” into a “reaction count” on the ui-layer. so instead of seeing several identical comments like: 👍, its visually more like slack, but on the backend its just a regular comment 🤔

So, I was exploring a similar thing when I was talking about making a “debate oriented” instance.

Basically the idea is that responses can be “flaired”, and you could make an empty comment, with that flair as a reaction.

I think it would be awesome to somehow bring both these features to fruition together.

EDIT: bundling this feature with “flair” would also presumably give communities more control over how these features are used (i.e. flair white/black list)

How TF is “Iran Contra” not in the actually happened category? Because North & Reagan got away with it?

Also, “Deep State” should be a lot lower. Snowden is a whistle blower, Assange is a journalist, & The WMD’s didn’t lie about themselves.

I’m still bewildered that he tried to right-click “save as” a webpage, hoping it would be executable. Then saying you have to be a developer to click the the “download raw” or “download zip” button 🤦‍♂️

the audio was completely about the victims, and nothing about FBI / NYPD fuckery