Inside party I would assume democratic centralism (which is how parties work anyway, despite scary name), people who don’t like resolution quit.
Your meeting hall would be empty after ten resolutions
Inside party I would assume democratic centralism (which is how parties work anyway, despite scary name), people who don’t like resolution quit.
Your meeting hall would be empty after ten resolutions
I don’t know if you’re in a political party or not, but say you are.
And say there’s a proposal that the party could choose to adopt or reject. Will we issue a statement of support for Palestine?
Would you be want a coin to be flipped to make that decision?
I feel like Iran doesn’t really want a war. They have to retaliate, they can’t turn the other cheek, but they’re trying to avoid anything REALLY destructive to themselves like an all-out war.
Angela Wildman is also accused of using a carton of milk and a long-handled mop as weapons after she had put the bird into a sports bag.
Yes. Agree.
What do you mean by the word in this context?
Agree.
This seems to contradict what you just said.
Agree in the case of electing representatives. Sometimes by the nature of what you are voting on there can only be one winner.
e.g. if society has resources to build one hospital, and if that hospital is not some weird quantum hospital that can be in two places, then it must be in one place, so it’s a single-winner choice among locations
Is the hospital location example a “process by which society’s scarce resources (commodities, nature, leisure, whatever) are allocated between people with competing interests” or is that “Matters of popular opinion” in the distinction you’re making?