Ha! They must have missed the billboards, front page newspaper articles, TV reports, and public service annou- oh wait.

deleted by creator

Yeah this way starmer won’t piss off the right wing and attract the attention of their media, like Corbyn did.

Sounds like you don’t like open worlds. Maybe don’t play them?

Yes we can ignore all other parties, voting for a third party is a wasted vote.

I still can’t believe Indiana Jones managed to avoid that interview.

That’s not what this is, this is just taking more money from poor people. People aren’t going to change their entire lifestyle and get healthier because one of the cheapest things gets more expensive. They’ll either pay more and continue to get fat or switch to something else that’s cheap but equally unhealthy and continue to get fat.

Cheap sugar isn’t the problem, expensive healthier food is. Changing things so the sugar is also expensive is fucking stupid if the aim is to make people get healthier, even ignoring the fact that “making” people do anything is shitty anyway.

And I don’t think the government should be deciding it for us, punishing people who dare to eat or drink sugar with higher prices, nor have yet another avenue of tax to funnel into their pockets.

You can’t do things unless you get achievements for them? Good lord.

When I was on high school 20 years ago I was the only person I knew who played the campaigns.

Young people? Every young gamer I know has never played the campaign in any Call of Duty game despite playing multiplayer in all of them. The only people who do are older and they’re far, far more willing to accept mediocre crap.

In fact these days the young people are all playing Fortnite anyway.

If I pause a video, literally the only thing that is absolutely one hundred percent certain is that I’m not looking at the video. What a stupid idea.

Fair enough, that’s what I do too.

How easy would it have been to include the name of the game in either of your comments?

That’s just another symptom of chasing perceived profits. If they were dedicated to releasing good products they’d understand retaining good talent that has experience working together is an important part of it.

Obviously that’s a pipe dream because they’re all vultures circling over a games publisher, picking off what they can until they can feast on its corpse, but still.

I suspect there wouldn’t be as many releases if they were only releasing good ones.

This is a false argument. They ARE profitable when they bother to try and make a good one. It’s when they fill it full of mtx and drag every aspect of the game except the enjoyment out for as long as possible to try and convince you to buy shit to make it actually enjoyable after you’ve already paid full price. They don’t get create poor games and then complain they’re not profitable enough - bad products aren’t profitable because they are bad products.

The risk off getting caught being in the country illegally, which increases when you fraudulently vote in an election, dumbass.

Yes, you’ve paid so much tax, are you not pissed off that the Tories are stealing it? And £100 is all it costs to buy you out?

There’s been films made of these books, I’m surprised you’ve literally never heard of them. You’re in luck though because they’re absolutely fantastic and there’s almost forty of them I think. I recommend googling Sam Vines and starting with his books. Just because he’s my favourite. Or maybe The Wee Free Men, a bit more kid friendly but still excellent.