• zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also bolded nations (state-sponsored), political organizations, state institutions such as armies and intelligence services.

    Exactly for that reason. Ukraine is openly and clandestinely attacking* Russia, most likely with help from Western governments. The goal is to instill fear in the Russian population in order to reduce the russian population’s willingness to support or accept the ongoing SMO/war against Ukraine/NATO expansion.

    • I’m not judging, they’re at war.
    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The goal is to deny Russia a supply route. If they wanted to instill fear they’d strike apartment buildings like the Russians do.

      • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ukraine was likely behind the assassination of Darya Dugin and they’ve flown drones armed with explosives over residential areas in Moscow.

        Just one source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65751632

        Not to forget the Nordstream pipelines (though I’m sure the US was heavily involved).

        Come on man, there are no good people in war. Stop the “Russian talking points” line while simultaneously regurgitating Western talking points. It’s quite tiresome.

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “No good people in the war that Russia started and is perpetuating.”

          Ukraine’s options for ending the war here are either continue fighting (in its own territory, even) or lay down and die. Are you seriously recommending it do the latter?

          If you want better results, you should spend your time convincing Russia to end their war of aggression, instead of removed about the lengths Ukraine must go to if it wants to not die.

          • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll make sure to give Putin a call and let him know once I’ve finished dinner.

            • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or just stop posting Russia apologia and Ukraine whataboutism on the Internet? Pretty easy fix imo.

              • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                And leave everyone exposed to one-sided Western propaganda that’s already all over the media? Nah, pass. I did my own research into the whole Ukraine/Russia/maidan coup story years ago after stumbling upon some people critical of the Western narrative. You and people like you can downvote and keep on repeating the same NATO talking points all you want, I’m not here for the clout/karma/whatever. :)

                • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So because Western news exists you’ve decided to suck down one-sided Russian propaganda? That’s the stupidest thing I’ve heard. There is actually a true story here, despite attempts by willing idiots like you to apologize for Russian atrocities and hide the truth in Ukraine. You should consider that the next time you decide to shill on the Internet for imperialistic dictators.

                  • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You keep on repeating yourself and it’s quite obvious you’re not acting in good faith and that you’re incapable of accepting that people may actually form opinions that aren’t your own. I’m out. If you all you see is Russian propagandists, have fun living in that reality.

                  • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Thanks for sharing your opinion, you’re bringing a lot of good arguments to the table.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll grant you Darya’s assassination is suspect, but like you admit, there’s no confirmation. As for the drones, that’s a ridiculous false equivalence given those drones were targeting military assets and no civilians were hurt by them, unlike Russias pattern of deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure.

          I’ve seen no credible evidence that anyone other than Russia was behind the Nordstream attacks, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise.

          I might add my grandparents were great when they fought off the fascist Nazis and Imperial Japanese. Russia is wholly in the wrong for this war and did so only under the false assumption they’d be able to take over quickly and with acceptable repercussions.

          You’re the one bringing up “Russian talking points”; the views I present are my own.

          • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re the one bringing up “Russian talking points”; the views I present are my own.

            He said, she said - we’re going in circles here. Either we’re both able to accept that we have our own views, hopefully based on research of somewhat neutral or at least sources of both sides or we’ll keep throwing mud at each other for no reason.

            I’ve seen no credible evidence that anyone other than Russia was behind the Nordstream attacks, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise.

            Sure thing, see:

            After months of accusations by Western states that Russia carried out the attack against itself, the narrative about Russian “ghost ships” began to crumble. On May 21, the Swedish paper, Expressen, wrote that “the Russian ships have been able to be excluded from the investigation” because “their positions have been mapped and the conclusion must be that they have not been in such a place that they could have carried out the deed.” […] In a June 7 article, the Washington Post cited intelligence gleaned from the Discord Files to assert that the Ukrainian military had secretly orchestrated the Nord Stream sabotage. “All those involved reported directly to Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s highest-ranking military officer,” the Post claimed, “who was put in charge so that the nation’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, wouldn’t know about the operation, the intelligence report said."

            Source: The Grayzone

            I’m aware TGZ is suspect to many (I can already hear the “tanki tankie!!!11” crowd) and I don’t take anything they write at face value either, but seriously, this is solid reporting on the matter, a good summary of the various narratives that have been put into play so far, it’s well sourced and based on data collected by Erik Andersson who lead an independent diving expedition to the blast sites. You can also check out his Substack if you absolutely don’t want to read TGZ.

            If you’re still convinced it was Russia, I don’t know what to tell you.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the goal were to instill fear in Russian citizens, they’d be attacking Russian citizens.

      They are not.

      They are attacking a Russian supply line to hamper their offensive efforts.

      When you give bad faith actors the benefit of the doubt, you look like a bad faith actor yourself. Stop parroting Russian talking points as if there’s a way for Ukraine to have their approval without capitulating.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the goal were to instill fear in Russian citizens, they’d be attacking Russian citizens

        For example, like the Kremlin is bombing Ukrainian apartment buildings and murdering civilians.

        • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re replying to a comment where I explicitly mention that Russia and Ukraine are at war. Duh. Thanks for… explaining war?

          I never disputed that Russia is killing Ukrainians. wtf.