• BlurstyOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not here for a debate

    Sir, this is the internet.

    You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

    • bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

      Sir, this is the internet.

      Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

      • BlurstyOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looks like you’re here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

        You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.