Research has found that race-neutral policies were not enough to achieve diversity in Brazil’s higher education system. Three scholars probe what that means for the United States.
  • KevonLooney@lemm.eeEnglish
    16·
    1 year ago

    Specifically, we found that:

    • Those admitted to universities via affirmative action performed quite well in their studies. By the time they graduated, their grade-point averages were not much different from the GPAs of other students. In the most selective majors, the disparities in GPAs that existed when students began their studies had largely disappeared by graduation.

    • Students admitted through affirmative action did not hamper the learning of their peers. Sometimes, they outperformed peers who entered college the regular way without affirmative action. This is a reminder that traditional admissions processes may not be as meritocratic as some people may think.

    The dirty secret of top schools is that the selectivity is artificial. Probably 50% of the applicants to Ivy League schools would do well there. These universities are already selecting students based on arbitrary measures (SAT tests, sports and club participation, volunteering, “leadership”) that have no relation to performance in school.

    That’s the real disparity. If someone can’t play the flute in the band because they have an after school job, they are penalized. If they play a different instrument, like guitar in a band with friends, they are penalized. If they help take care of their poor grandparents, instead of unrelated poor people, they are penalized.