• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. And I don’t get how Bostock vs Clayton County doesn’t trump all this bullshit? It says that protection for sex also covers gender identity and sexual orientation because those 2 things are in-part defined by sex already.

    Wouldn’t that case mean all these anti-gay, anti-trans laws are already unconstitutional?