The absurd notice got people thinking about labor laws, unionization, and the ways low-wage workers are consistently taken advantage of.

  • Meow.tar.gz@lemmy.goblackcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as employment is at will, I will say fuck you to employers as quickly as they say fuck you to me. That’s the way it works. You want loyalty, show some in return.

  • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You know the worst thing about being a slave? They make you work all day, but they don’t pay you or let you go.”

    – Philip J. Fry

  • DougHolland@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s kinda funny, and I laughed.

    It’s also shit journalism — the article doesn’t say what McDonald’s posted this sign or enacted this policy. Maybe some McDonald’s did, but when there’s no attempt at sniffing out a who - what - where - why - when, it’s piffle.

    Any schmoe anywhere could’ve made the sign using Microsoft Paint.

    The article is a laugh, but it isn’t news until someone says where it happened…

  • db2@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder what their recourse is if someone doesn’t follow the policy. 🤔

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this include a clause in the employment contract that McDonalds will never fire you without a “meeting to resolve the issue” first? Oh, these employees don’t have a contract at all, you say? How interesting.

  • bricks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Others have touched on this, but isn’t this a good thing? You should NEVER quit without recourse - it makes you ineligible for unemployment. Scenarios:

    • you want to leave, you tell your manager, they resolve the issue, you stay and are happier

    • you want to leave, you tell your manager, they don’t resolve the issue, you engage in getting fired, you get fired, you file for unemployment

    • you want to leave, you tell your manager, they don’t resolve the issue, you engage in getting fired, you don’t get fired, you collect wages for little/no work while job hunting

    • you want to leave, you don’t tell your manager, you engage in getting fired, you get fired, you file for unemployment

    • you want to leave, you don’t tell your manager, you engage in getting fired, you don’t get fired, you collect wages for little/no work while job hunting

    • you quit, you get nothing

    It’s like a weird game theory problem, but IMO quitting is the WORST choice. Sure, the employer could challenge the unemployment claim, but many don’t, and those who do don’t typically win.

    • jocanib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quitting with no notice is one of the funniest stunts you can pull on a bad manager and I will not hear a word said against it.

      • bradv@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        You want two week’s notice? Here’s your two week’s notice: In two weeks you’ll notice I haven’t been here for two weeks.

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even funner is getting your vacation approved, then turning in your notice. Thanks for letting me not even be here (they weren’t going to pay out that vacay)

        • jocanib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I got to do that once, being in a country where we get 5 weeks paid holiday every year. I hadn’t taken any in a year and the boss tried to take the piss so I explained that I wouldn’t be working my notice and left.

          That was back in the day when jobs were easy to come by. So I got eight weeks pay the following month.

          Company disappeared off the internet three months later.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right. I think the above commenter was talking about a situation where you need the money. But as you pointed out, if you don’t need the money, or if you have another job starting tomorrow, then there’s no issue with bailing ASAP. It can also be therapeutic for you and entertaining for coworkers.

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got to “fuck you, I quit” a guy who then laughed it off. Two weeks later he wanted to know why I was emptying my tool box on a Friday afternoon. Already did the paperwork with HR on “fuck you” day, never seen someone so stunned in my life.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fiscally, yes. Staying in a toxic job, even while trying to not give a fuck can be disasterous for mental health.

      • bricks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man… ain’t that the truth. My hope is that people can adopt sort of a cold abstraction from the situation. I know realistically, that’s not the typical case.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fortunately, it is the typical case. It all varies by country and field, but a large fraction of the workforce is either disengaged or actively disengaged in their jobs. They have figured out how to stop worrying and love the bomb.

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This sign is not a good thing.

      It’s meant to confuse employees regarding their rights and to make them think that their employer has all the power in the relationship dynamic. If people are afraid to quit, they won’t assert themselves.

      I can’t read the rest of the sign but it’s possible that McDonald’s are trying to suggest that if an employee quits then they have to pay back a portion of their wages or some other kind of retaliatory/intimidation tactic. It wouldn’t hold up in court but the purpose is to keep your employees under your heel. How many minimum wage employees have a lawyer on retainer? How many know that you can contact your states labor board about this sort of thing. Keep employees uneducated and confused about their rights and they can’t fight back.

    • KerPop47@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      While all that is true, not letting people leave is involuntary servitude, and only the government can do it, and even then only through due process. You have a right to leave your job right now. You can talk to your manager of you want to, but you don’t have to do any more work for them.

    • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly this “policy” seems more like no ghosting than no quitting. The notion that you have to tell your manager that you won’t be back seems pretty dang reasonable. I don’t know what the consequences are or how they plan to enforce it though so we don’t have enough information to make a call really.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, the notion that you have to tell your manager won’t be back is not reasonable. In reality, most people would want to tell their employers because it makes practical sense. But there are situations every day where people need to drop that job and go do something else. It could be an abusive or violent employer, a death in the family, a health issue, an unexpected move to Timbuktu, whatever. We should let people use their own best judgment, because the simple solution is for the employer to just stop paying them and move on with life.

        Fortunately, this is also what the law says in most places.

        • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh…it’s not like they’re not requiring you to put in 2 weeks notice, just tell a manager “Fuck you, I quit” at minimum. That’s a pretty low bar. It’s literally just no ghosting. And not like there is any enforcement mechanism assumed anyway, it’s just a sign. Abusive employer situation, sure…no one would judge them and it’s not like they can legally do anything.

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They posted a rule that is inconsistent with state and federal law. That’s unethical and I think it should be illegal. Many employees do not understand their rights as workers, and many companies exploit that.

            The company could reword things such that the rule is a polite request. Or they could offer their employees contracts. Or they could offer a severance bonus if you give them notice. Those would all be reasonable, and I think contracts would be especially good.

            • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason” is inconsistent with the law as well.

      • moozogew@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They should offer an incentive not a threat ‘if you plan on quitting then talk to a manager, he’ll help you develop an exit strategy and sign you up for a thank you gift of some free burgers accredited to your app…’

        It’s still bullshit but it’s not such abusive bullshit that modern workers seem to be getting used to

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I clock in & then just leave?

        It’s technically not quitting. I’d just show up each day, clock in, then fuck off & go bowling.

        They’d probably fire me, but would they still have to pay me for the time I was on the clock?

          • scutiger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Quiet quitting” involves actually doing your job, but the bare minumum. It’s just not doing more than absolutely required, and in a reasonable place isn’t even a proper cause to fire someone.

  • theyresocool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I worked as a server in early 00’s. I fought to not be a manager but I did everything else in the restaurant might as well do that too. Did it. Quit in 6 months. Took the skills and never looked back.

    Food service is a shit industry. Why have it?

  • lordgeoffery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That just means the employees can leave on vacation without approval for few months, come back and still be employed 😂

  • NeoAgostosTheos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The flip side of this, I’m surprised McDonalds hasn’t issued a statement or taken action to mitigate this PR disaster and potential lawsuits.