• vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actually there’s no military difference except Russia will implode because of the news alone.

    Now, until it implodes there’s simply no realistic chance any nukes will fly from Russia. After it implodes, the chance is minimal, though there may be some nuclear blackmail like what North Korea does, always ending with a humanitarian shipment of grain or something.

    The whole point of all this maneuvering is to preserve Russia’s integrity. This is why weaponry given to Ukraine is limited in class and modernity.

    This is rather cruel to Ukrainians (and Russians, because also means that NATO countries are not interested in real regime change, they are interested in controlling the current regime), but is really obvious.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree with most of what you said. But NATO getting fully and directly involved - As in moving in with 10s of thousands of troops to take part of Ukraine that Russia has claimed (Eg Crimea) would be a massive escalation, and I don’t think there’s a credible military or geopolitics expert who would disagree.