Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

  • I shouldn’t have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.

  • We shouldn’t have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that’s blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

  • FancyGUI@lemmy.fancywhale.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can tell for a fact that there’s nothing new going on. Only the MASSIVE investment from Microsoft to allow them to train on an insane amount of data. I am no “expert” per se, but I’ve been studying and working with AI for over a decade - so feel free to judge my reply as you please

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      nothing new going on

      I can’t think of anything less accurate to say about LLMs other than that they’re a world-ending threat.

      This is a bit like saying “The internet is a cute thing for tech nerds but will never go mainstream” in like 1995.