• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Saving a couple of hours per person is a lot of hours given the volume of people this infrastructure moves. Also, people are a lot more likely to go on a two hour trip than a 4 hour one. This makes it possible to go from SH to BJ and come back the same day which means you’d have a lot more people travelling and a stimulus to the economy as a result.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I guess we’ll see, but I don’t really see why they wouldn’t bother. I mean it’s a way for state to create a whole bunch of employment.

            • Bronstein_Tardigrade
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Capitalist thinking. A government that will do something to actually help the working class, simply because it helps the working class, is beyond western, imperialist thinking.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Halving travel time is not a minimal gain, but more importantly it’s a demonstration of technological prowess. If China has a commercial maglev operating it’s a showcase of things they can build for other countries. It’s important to keep in mind that a lot of countries don’t have well developed HSR systems or much rail at all. If China can now offer building maglev for them which is ahead of what any other country can do.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Indeed, I’m just noting factors in favor of building a demonstration line even if it might seem wasteful on the surface.

    • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      the chinese cycle:

      “okay its just a preliminary test”

      “okay they just tested it again”

      “alright they implemented it but it wont be feasible”

      “so its feasible but they wont expand implementation”

      BREAKING: China expands implementation.

  • btbt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The only people who could ever eventually find a way to go faster than the speed of light are Chinese train engineers

    • Bronstein_Tardigrade
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      GE sold their Locomotive Division to the Chinese to initially get the wheels turning. No market in the US for hi-speed trains, and just look at them now. More of that technology the Chinese “stole” from the US.