I’ve been reading similar head lines about this Paris summit for some days now. After reading this article it still doesn’t sound too special. Like it’s more problem oriented and has a bottom-up approach; so does anyone get what exaclty is " new " about it?

  • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for your trouble in reacting to my question. In so far I see, I do agree with your first statement.

    But, please refrain from using broken dogmas, neo imperialistische dreams and stay on topic. Your usage of last century rhetoric & phrasing is, indeed nothing new, and extremely passé.

    You do realise that globalisation is the de facto driving force creating a multipolar world? Everything is connected. The G7 accounts for more than half the global wealth and 30- 40% of the world’s GDP Disregarding them isn’t wise, feasible nor possible.

    Also, you do realise that: “the original acronym “BRIC” (or “the BRICs”) was coined in 2001 by* Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill*.” Yes he was an “imperialist”.