Glad to hear some good news.
While it’s good to see removal from fossil fuels, I’d rather see investitions into nuclear, which have advantage of (relative) cleanness of renewables without their production instability.
Foookin Yaaasssss
Which investment generates more energy? How about weighted by usefulness in various ways?
Removed by mod
It’s largely a problem of energy storage, which is going to be solved one way or another. Never bet against technology.
I’d love to hear that solar panels get easier to recycle… The e waste issue bugs me.
Removed by mod
I’m actually more onboard than you suppose, I moved my entire family abroad to a more walkable town with train links over a year ago and ditched the car for a bike. I lost 30 lbs more or less by accident before starting to work out for real. I’ve never been this healthy in my life, and the rare occasion I need a car, a local taxi service can get me to an int’l airport for less than the cost of a tank of gas, or around town for £5 flat. Boom, fuck a car.
That’s a bizzare and frankly nonsensical argument. First of all, power is not just necessary when working (leisure, ac, etc use power too), secondly there are tons of jobs which have to be done at night. They’re not done at night “just because”. I’m sure many of those would like to “not work” at night, but then the world wouldn’t work… Then there’s also the problem that not everywhere has sufficient sunlight during winter. It’d be impossible to power Sweden throughout winter using only solar power for instance. Solar is great, but the solution to achieve greater adoption isn’t just to ignore the downsides with it, but rather to accomdate them.
