For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires’ son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They’ve been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they’ll make it?

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is going to come up in engineering safety classes for years. If the CEO says safety is a pure waste, you need to leave that job.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He has a slightly valid point, that at some extent safety can be overdone and you’re wasting time and money. However… repeated instances without a disaster (short of say, decades worth) don’t prove safety precautions are unnecessary, but one catastrophe can prove the the opposite.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s his examples that makes me think he wasn’t serious on safety overall. There’s different kinds of risks and we take them on every day, but everyday risks are way less deadly. It’s disingenuous to brush off safety for a sub heading 13k feet down into the ocean by talking about the risks of driving.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, definitely. His examples are somewhat like “if you would fly on a a commercial jetliner, why not be an experimental pilot or an astronaut?” or “if you’d take a trip to a hiking area near your house, why not climb Mt. Everest?”