• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok I see. And the reason for that is because beehaw has defederated my server, but my server has not defederated beehaw, correct?

      Kinda confusing, I guess I thought of federation as a bilateral agreement for some reason, but actually each instance unilaterally decides who to federate with, and its not always reciprocal.

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Think of it like blocking someone. beehaw defederated from sh.itjust.works so they can’t see anything from sh.itjust.works. not comments, not threads, not communities. 100% blocked. whereas the reverse isn’t true. you’re not able to get communities or content from beehaw (because they blocked and aren’t sending it to you), but their comments and threads elsewhere in the fediverse are still shared with you. This thread is hosted on lemmy.ml, so everyone federated with lemmy.ml can see it and interact with it; this is why you can see the beehaw user’s comment.

        However, since beehaw defederated with sh.itjust.works, your reply remains unseen by them. sh.itjust.works could mutually defederate/block beehaw and you wouldn’t see the comment. but that’s up to your instance whether you wanna do that or not.

        • LostCause@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love you for explaining this so clearly, I was actually so confused about this I may or may not have misinformed someone else, oops.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok thanks for explaining. I don’t see any reason we would defederate beehaw, they only blocked us because trolls were signing up on our server and spamming toxic stuff to their communities. Totally understandable, and hopefully we can reconnect with them once this platform matures a bit.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know some people on lemmy.world were discussing defederating with beehaw because they were thinking it was annoying/confusing to have beehaw stuff show up even when beehaw defederated with them (and thus results in situations like this).

            personally, I’m of the philosophy that it’s good to federate with as many instances as possible. and that’s how kbin has been doing things so far. other instances may wish to intentionally select which instances they federate to craft particular experiences (like what beehaw did). just depends on what you’re after.

            • savoy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Defederation should honestly be saved for the worst of the worst. What beehaw has done just doesn’t really make much sense. They’re intentionally blocking themselves off from the rest of the fedi, and I don’t think it’s because of trolls/spam. It seems like any comments that don’t fit the culture they want are seen as a reason to defederate.

              I mean that’s fine for them, they can stay in their bubble, but it means their users could potentially miss on a lot of content as well; it honestly hurts them more than the rest of us. And the longer they stay that way, the more they’ll suffer, unfortunately.

              • Marxine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It seems like any comments that don’t fit the culture they want are seen as a reason to defederate.

                This is the main reason I didn’t create my account there. I like reading discussions in political topics, and beehaw seems to have a heavy aversion to that.

                • savoy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s that hypocritical stance of refusing to be political/choose a side yet not realizing that is also inherently political. Time will tell if their users are fine in a moated community or if it seriously hampers its growth to devolving into an echo chamber

                  • Marxine@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Hard agree on this. And oftentimes being in the “I’m apolitical” camp only favors the opressing side. Nothing in human society can be fully unbiased or 100% neutral

              • Silviecat44@vlemmy.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Beehaw sounded to me like a hyper controlled instance which is partially why I didn’t sign up there

            • tobor@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel like even though this is all pretty chaotic in the short term, it feels like it could be a pretty good learning experience for the strengths and weaknesses of federating in general