There is no rule against anarchism, why was I banned?

Also I don’t support the unibombers methods, I am just an anarchist. This goes against the ideas of 196, where the only rule is that you have to post before you leave. @threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone and other mods, I am very upset

  • half@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Try not to take it too personally: the commies are extra sensitive at the moment because they have to share the fediverse with a giant influx of liberals. You’d probably be upset if they were pouring into your space. Not that anybody owns it, but we all take things for granted. It’ll cool off.

    edit: the gears of this sarcasm machine are lubricated by Marxist tears

    • faceless@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been reading the modlog (something that Lemmy does really well is make modding transparent) and people have been getting banned for stupid reasons like this

        • WhatWouldKarlDo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In one sentence, I think that the proletariat are entitled to the fruits of their labour. What’s yours?

              • half@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Only if being “entitled to the fruits of labor” does not preclude the state (or any state-like entity, don’t even start with me) from seizing and/or arbitrating the value of that fruit. If that’s the case, what is the value of the so-called entitlement?

                The reason private property is vital to a just society is that we do not know the ultimate purpose of society. We can not even estimate the size of the universe; claiming to understand the role of mankind without knowing its position in the cosmos is like claiming to understand a blood cell with no knowledge of the circulatory system. We all have exactly the same right and cause to determine the purposes of our own lives. Different life goals lead to different evaluations of goods and services. I do not eat flesh, listen to K-pop, or ski. To appropriate the value of my labor for the benefit of these systems for which I have no use is a violation of my natural right to determine the purpose of my own life. To phrase it collectively, it is a violation of our equal rights to determine the purposes of our own lives.

                • WhatWouldKarlDo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue with me about? It’s your fruit. Do with it as you will, and pass those rights along.