How many of you have tried using SearXNG? It’s a meta search engine that pull data from a number of sources before ranking and displaying them. I really like the cached feature that tries to load the internet archive copy of the page.

  • knfrmity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got a private instance going a few months ago and I really like it. It’s just a little slow cause it runs on a Pi (my only 24/7 device at the moment). The hostname rewrite feature is cool and I’ll have to check out the archive cache feature.

    I also use a public instance at work and it’s way more effective than the bloated corporate search engines. Super handy for engine or language specific searches too.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s good and I use it but at the same time I have also noticed that specially Google results are sometimes absolutely bad compared to directly searching on Google, and I am talking so bad that it probably is on purpose.

    But it’s fine because bangs will give you all the power

  • mixx941@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running a private instance for about a year as my main search engine and for a few friends. Really great results with the aggregation, simple to maintain, and have only had a couple issues where my IP got rate limited by one engine for a day or so.

  • Spun up the container about a week ago. Made it my default search in Firefox. So far I’ve been happy with the quality of the results although I will admit there is a perceptible lag when submitting searches, compared to google/bing/etc… I imagine that’s mostly to do with the fact that it’s waiting on multiple search engines to fill my request.

    I do like it so far. I figure with some tuning I could get the response time down.

  • EponymousBosh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just started using it recently. It’s pretty good. I like that it doesn’t try to sell me a bunch of shit.

  • L_Acacia@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my experience SearX is the search engine that gives the best result for me once configurated to my liking, event beating google ( by getting some of google’s results ). The only downside is that sometimes the instances I use are down and I have to use another.

  • WreckingBANG@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really tried to love it. I tweaked a lot of settings but i never quite got the results i wanted. I still have a selfhosted instance running for occasional use. But i mainly use DuckDuckGo now.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use SearXNG since half a year or so I think. It can be a little bit slow at times and some source engines will be deactivated temporarily. But overall its good enough for my daily use. I don’t search the web too often anyway and often use the search on the services webpage directly (Steam, Wikipedia or other stuff in example). One can default to SearXNG and in some cases use DuckDuckGo or Startpage (instead Google) for alternative results.

    However sometimes an instance is offline temporarily or forever (but never tested after forever, so not sure about that). In those cases I have to switch to a different instance in Firefox default search engine, which I have bookmarked a few to choose from. So be prepared.