There’s a difference between what’s best for gaining popularity within online “left” spaces, and what’s best for advancing the revolutionary struggle. It’s not hard to notice this problem, the members of the left-wing video essay community “Breadtube” have repeatedly observed how there’s an issue with making politics into a fandom. Yet it’s not like merely recognizing this problem makes these creators able to see what the solution is. That solution is to not just become disillusioned with the notion that consuming Breadtube does anything to change the balance of class power, but also give up the ideology that underlies this false solution. To sell the illusion that online politics represents something genuinely offensive towards the existing power structure, the facilitators and spokespeople of these fandoms have to propagate a certain idea: that anybody who deviates from what’s considered the approved narratives within left spaces is an enemy, that to be considered “respectable” you’d better know what not to think and say.
One cannot claim to be serious about the cause of workers’ liberations while repeating and reinforcing imperialist propaganda narratives.
This purity fetish has to stop. Guilt by association gets us nowhere, and the term “patsoc” has become just another meaningless smear term.
Rainer explicitly advocates for the return of the Soviet Union, this is the antithesis of Russian nationalism.
Please show me where he ever said this.
I have seen no indication of this in any of his writings.