I wish people would stop complaining about the WFA cuts. Those that need them still get them, and triple lock pensions are going up by an estimated £460.
Even if they lose out on their £150, they’re still going to make a gain on £310.
Isn’t the concern that “Those that need them still” won’t get them? There is a HUGE amount of unclaimed benefits in this country. Many old people can’t cope with the level of tech you need to apply (you can’t just phone up or pop into a benefits centre in most parts of uk).
I wish people would stop complaining about the WFA cuts. Those that need them still get them, and triple lock pensions are going up by an estimated £460.
Even if they lose out on their £150, they’re still going to make a gain on £310.
Isn’t the concern that “Those that need them still” won’t get them? There is a HUGE amount of unclaimed benefits in this country. Many old people can’t cope with the level of tech you need to apply (you can’t just phone up or pop into a benefits centre in most parts of uk).
The amount of people claiming it went up massively thanks to the news surrounding WFA.
I get your point, but that is a principle that shouldn’t be applied. You could use the same logic to give anyone any benefit, just incase.
How is that a counter argument?
“Sure you have a point, but I’m not going to listen to it because I don’t want to”
don’t threaten us with a good time