the historical reference in question:
I love how westerners need to keep rediscovering the “simpler equipment that you can actually make a bunch of beats the amazing wunderwaffe” idea over and over again, you’d think WW2, you know, literally the largest war ever fought, would teach some lessons, but I guess not
Lulz.
Yeah Neoliberal and NATO war strategy is hyper-focused on their fancy toys.
I keep trying to explain to people that hte T-72 is less armored than the Abrams bc the T-72 designers put “can this cross bridges so it can actually get to a battle” as the top of their weight allowance.
What? How would it withstand rocks thrown by terrorists when invading a 3rd world country then?