K (189?–?) Soviet pioneer. From Kazan, Tartarstan, USSR, K was diagnosed as a ‘transvestite’ in 1937.

She was given permission by the People’s Court to wear female clothing, her identity papers were changed to her female name, and her name was removed from the military recruitment rolls.

She was featured in a 1957 gynaecology textbook.

M.G. Serdiukov. Sudebnaia ginekologiia I sudebnoi akusherstvo. Moscow: Meditsina 1957: 47-8.
Dan Healey. Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia: The Regulation of Sexual and Gender Dissent. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2001: fig 24.

source

Please help donate to Palestinians who just lost their home thanks to the zionist fucks


Join our public Matrix server! https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat

As a reminder, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It’s for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.

Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Best collection of resources I know:

    https://dragonsroost.neocities.org/

    Here are some criticisms of structural dissociation:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210507154502/https://polyfrazzlemented.dreamwidth.org/40446.html

    As a Marxist-Leninist I see it as a complete failure that increasingly ignores contrary evidence. Examples:

    1. Assuming someone w/ disordered plurality without early childhood trauma must have childhood trauma and just forgot it b/c otherwise they would have developed it “too late” according to the model

    2. Headmates can be created by people with no history of trauma or dissociation, and tulpamancy skills can be applied to disordered plurals implying commonality between disordered and nondisordered plurality

    So I’m interested in diamat approaches to consciousness and will eventually read more Vygotsky. Although I’ve heard some English translations are very bad.

    “Why does X theory proposed by liberals not account for A, B, and C?”

    • rtstragedy [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thank you for sharing! I read a bunch about it and found it very interesting, as someone who’s currently I guess seeing an IFS counsellor, which has been my “medical” introduction to it (although therapist doesn’t seem to believe in complete integration, just mentions reparenting, compromising, inner dialogue, etc. all of which sound kinda healthy to me. She also believes that everyone is a system as well, which I found interesting, wonder what your thoughts are on that?).

      The structural dissociation critique is interesting, yikes that ending.

      (love that pic btw)

      • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        She also believes that everyone is a system as well, which I found interesting, wonder what your thoughts are on that?).

        I don’t really have an opinion and I don’t know much about IFS parts but I thought they don’t really behave as independent agents? Although headmates being parts of a system who work together is a very popular framework so I suppose from that POV it makes sense to compare the two. To each their own, but that framework isn’t personally relevant.

        love that pic btw

        Extended version of her calling me out

        • rtstragedy [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t really have an opinion and I don’t know much about IFS parts but I thought they don’t really behave as independent agents? Although headmates being parts of a system who work together is a very popular framework so I suppose from that POV it makes sense to compare the two. To each their own, but that framework isn’t personally relevant.

          Thank you for saying this, I appreciate you clarifying.

          good tweet