• pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reading through, it makes sense unlike Twitter’s policy change. Why should tech giants have access to Reddit’s API on Reddit’s dime at no benefit to Reddit or Reddit’s users? As long as users are able to keep running bots and alternative apps, I don’t see a problem. I just hope that they would allow free academic licenses.

    • kixik@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      The thing is whether privacy oriented frontends will be requested to pay or not. Cause one of the ways to detect whether one is a regular user, or something else, might be user accesses or requests. A frontend instance is in fact a 3rd party, and most probably will be detected as such, therefore privacy oriented frontends will vanish, as the ones for twitter did, right?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Reddit could add anti-bot restrictions, but they don’t, because bots drive up their “engagement” numbers. This is entirely two-faced. They essentially just want to make some money off of something they already see as benefitting them.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was thinking specifically of bots that are associated with a community, like moderation aids or Wheel of Time’s Lews Therin quote bot. I’m not sure the bots you’re thinking of actually do increase engagement numbers if they can be detected. Advertisers are only interested in human eyeballs.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Advertisers are only interested in human eyeballs.

          Very true, but this reveals the conflicts of interest between these social media companies, and the advertisers they sell space to. They want to say to advertisers: buy an ad on our site, it will reach thousands of real people! See all this activity! When in reality a lot of that activity is bot generated.

          Both advertisers and users want to reach and talk to real people, but it’s in these social media companies interest to inflate their numbers and fake engagement any way they can.

          This isn’t a small problem either, I’ve heard it said that half of all tweets, and a good percentage of youtube comments are from bots.

          • kungfuratte@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s even a reason for those companies not to sell “no advertisement” subscriptions to their users. Reddit could offer something like that, but it would mean to lose the most valuable eyeballs (which belong to the humans who can afford to pay for not seeing ads) when it comes to marketing the website to advertisers.