Anyone doing academic writing, from students at university to scientists, nurses, doctors, engineers, math teachers, vets, all need to read and reference many, many of these academic texts to do any sort of research.

Now imagine every time you want to cite anything, you can only read the synopsis at best because every source wants you to spend $50.

It’s normal to need like 50 references for a research paper by the way (although students can get away with 10-20)

I’m sure locking the culmination of human knowledge behind a paywall and limiting the amount of people that can contribute to that knowledge will end well for the species.

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Eat shit, racist. Chinese papers are leagues more professional and relavent to my ecology research than the American papers funded by 3M to lie about how dangerous their latest product is

    • robinnist@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The issue of “paper mills” is not exclusive to China, this being an issue in the West as well. Your mentioning of this ultimately comes down to reddit logo anti-China brainrot.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          2 days ago

          very-intelligent I am against both the colonizer and the colonized! Both the imperialist and the imperialized! Who cares about historical context and modern geopolitical dynamics when I can just pretend that they are all equal at the level of a platonic state!

          Every time the “but I’m against everyone” argument gets wheeled out, inevitably the critique of the US is that healthcare should be free and the “critique” of China is that the subversive oriental savages must be exterminated.

          Extremely typical western chauvinist “leftist” behavior. Completely unsurprising.

        • PointAndClique [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Being anti-intellectual in the process. This is research and education we’re talking about so your swipe at Chinese ‘paper mills’ that you’re passing off as principled anti-statism is indistinguishable from peddling tried and tired US State Department anti-China tropes. Nice going

        • Duży Szef [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 days ago

          Only someone woefully anti-intellectual would come to such a simple and “common sense” conclusion. I hope one day you look back and cringe at how confident in being wrong you now are.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So you’re so burgerbrained that you think that all this paywalling shit is somehow… what? Quality control?

      At least brush your tongue after you lick boots that hard. I can smell the corpo boot polish on your breath from here, you sycophantic sinophobic bootlicker.

    • meth_dragon [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      chinese system is just the western system put into a much more highly competitive environment. the paper mills are symptoms of a (shittily designed and archaic) system operating in a cultural and socioeconomic environment it should not be operating in.