lenin-dont-laugh

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god? Complete and utter self-report.

    How the hell is he considered a beauty standard?

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s blind-leading-the-blind chuddery. They don’t ask feeemales what is attractive, so they have this weird fixation on what they think is attractive to feeemales and want to back that up with coercion and violence.

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago
      lewd discussion on sex

      Being a “sex god”, to the type of “man” Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman’s pleasure doesn’t factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that’s enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn’t matter, it’s never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That’s his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      Isn’t his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god?

      i actually don’t think that’s true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don’t talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of “pleasing women”