• GreatSquare
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Where’s the evidence that a nuclear submarine was there in the first place? Wuhan is not near the sea.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Check this out. Compare the picture in this article to the stuff in the “sunken sub” picture. It matches perfectly, including the crates on the pier even. There was almost certainly a sub there at one point at least. Whether it sunk or not, who’s to say. It looks like the cranes are doing something though, right where the sub was in the earlier picture.

      Governments are going to lie. All of them. Maybe don’t believe everything you see and double check to see if you can find more information. Sometimes it exists.

      Shipyards normally aren’t on the ocean, for many reasons. Inland is more protected from storms. It’s harder to target inland facitilites. Shipyards often develop from previously specialized shipbuilding locations, which are often on rivers. Many shipyards are island, and it really isn’t strange to see a sub built inland if you pay attention to this. Rivers connect to the sea.

      • GreatSquare
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My faith in the human intellect is lost after news stories like this.

        “Yo! See that shadow? There’s an invisible high tech tub of ice cream there. Go get it!”