• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    The people saying this know nothing about construction or what innovations are needed. Humans have been building housing for thousands of years and we have learned a lot over that time. Anyone asking for a technological overhaul generally doesn’t even know what we have learned and so is just going to make mistakes (sometimes deadly - there are many ways a house can kill) that someone in the industry would avoid. Generally they come up with something that costs more while being worse because they have no idea where the real problems are and so didn’t optimize it.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That is the other thing - there are already a lot of smart people thinking about it and making changes.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I feel like that contradicts what you said before, but I agree. Most ideas that sound good at first aren’t, but some actually go the distance. That applies retrospectively, and to current startups like this.

          (As pictured, in the application named, I do suspect it’s the former)

          Edit: Wait, this thing isn’t actually that expensive, by robot standards. Hmm.

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            The smart people thinking about construction know the real problems and are working on them. The people commenting here mostly don’t know what those issues are.