• Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jesus christ. I really thought that headline was exaggerated, but no, the brain samples they tested actually ended up being 0.5% plastic by weight. That’s seriously disturbing, I really would have thought the blood-brain barrier would do a better job of keeping plastics out.

    • SlippiHUD@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed. Nevermind all the other places they’ve found plastic pollution in our bodies.

  • DNOS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now that you have told me something kinda useless tell me how much longer is my shlong due to mycroplastic 🤔😏

    • SlippiHUD@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m saying the weight is, and it’s not just my skull, it’s everyone’s skull. It’s likely we’re all experiencing those issues. It’s also not up there in a single slab, but embedded throughout, which hopefully mitigates that issue.

      A study under peer review claims those with dementia are more likely to have more plastic in their brains than the average person.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      The bigger question is, how do these microplastics pass the blood/brain barrier?

      • Fleur__@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        From my understanding of the study they used an unverified method on a small part of the brain to get the amount of plastic in the entire brain. Which can be misleading because if you only look at the parts of the brain that are microplastics, the brain is 100% plastic. There hasn’t been widespread replication of the results yet either nor has the paper been peer reviewed.

        I’m sceptical especially with the microplastic doomer narrative going around. As far as I know the danger of microplastics on the human body is yet to be determined. But it’s definitely alarming I just don’t think it’s responsible to be saying there’s a credit card in your brain.

        • SlippiHUD@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That first paragraph is fair enough.

          I’d disagree that the microplastic doomer narrative is incorrect, the plastic in the brain is just the newest tidbit. It’s already in our kldneys, testicles, placentas, blood, semen, livers and lungs. Even if this study is wrong (which I don’t think it is, because its on trend with plastic contamination growth in the rest of our bodies) about how much plastic there is specifically in brains, there’s still easily a credit cards worth in our bodies.

          Microplastics are killing worms, it is contaminating soil, it is hurting crops, it is killing fish, and studied effects of plastic on other mammals are bad, to the point it seems pointless to confirm it hurts humans in specific ways before doing something about it.

      • Fleur__@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I gave the study a read. It’s in preprint, it’s yet to be peer reviewed and the method they used is atypical. Yeah I think disbelief is a pretty reasonable response since it’s hard to imagine that much plastic wouldn’t be making noticeable changes in behavior/physiology. But it’s possible and the research seems rigorous