• TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    28 days ago

    Jordan Peterson is really easy to critique though, like babies first philosophy 101 class easy to critique. The fact that he became popular and was taken seriously is a whole indictment of the state of popular philosophy. Like, for god’s sake, popular philosophy was in a better state when the existentials were at the helm, which is saying something since the existentialists were pretty shit most of the time.

    • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      28 days ago

      He isn’t even a philospher, right? isn’t he a psychologist? and a jungian one at that lol, uhhh yeah my shadow self is why I’m depressed, gotta go read the hero with a thousand faces to figure out why my childhood wasn’t good.

      • HamManBad [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah he was at the forefront of popular philosophy going from edgelord existentialist nerds to edgelord hacks completely devoid of meaningful philosophical consistency. Ironically, JBP is the embodiment of postmodernism

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        28 days ago

        He was a psychologist, but his books are much less about psychology and more about philosophy of society, the mind, and the nature of evil. There are elements of psychology to it, but it has more in common (from a literature perspective) with Marcus Aurelius than a Jung.