lord-bezos-amused

    • jackmarxist [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      29 days ago

      Honestly I didn’t know that random courts can do stuff like this in the US. Can’t Joe Biden sign some executive order or something?

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Joe Biden can punt a child across the white house lawn without consequence. He will simply shrug and call for the courts to be democratic and urge billionaires to pay their fair share of taxes. The end.

      • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        29 days ago

        as usual rather than passing anything in gridlocksville (congress) dems just have an agency of the executive branch issue a rule leaving it open to all kinds of easy legal challenges. So they can say “we tried”

      • StalinIsMaiWaifu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        29 days ago

        Biden can challenge this to higher level courts, but since they are also under Republican control they are probably going to tell him to pound sand.

        An executive order probably wouldn’t do anything (they’d rule it out too)

      • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        Even if they couldnt before, the Supreme Court recentlt ruled that courts get the final call over executive branch stuff. Things are unbelievably fucked over here

      • footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        I think the executive order would instruct the FTC to enforce their decision on non competes. The problem is that the courts as @Dessa has said the courts are now pushing back against the administrative state with recent decisions that overturned Chevron