hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agoI think the one that doesn't need any introduction or explanation stood the test of timehexbear.netimagemessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageI think the one that doesn't need any introduction or explanation stood the test of timehexbear.nethexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square1fedilink
minus-squareDragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoPicasso could easily smoke the guy on the left in the term of realism. Fun fact: Plenty of “modern” artist can do “classical” art just fine, it’s that they choose not to.
Picasso could easily smoke the guy on the left in the term of realism.
Fun fact: Plenty of “modern” artist can do “classical” art just fine, it’s that they choose not to.