• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    ugh I guess we will just learn to operate under total uncertainty. online media literacy classes for kids have become an urgent need.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s been urgent since the beginning of the rise of electronic mass media a hundred years ago. I’m sure we’ll get to it some day.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had a detecting propaganda workshop when i was a kid in a school in the US. Its not mandatory everywhere, but we do teach these things

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          should be mandatory everywhere and repeated every couple years throughout education because it evolves very fast

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          And I don’t mean this in any mean way, but how much propaganda did you learn to detect? Like understanding that the american dream is a propaganda?

          • delirious_owl@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Me? I thought the class was dumb because it was super obvious. But I’m inherently skeptical, and I do think its important to have for most people who don’t think critically.

            I can’t remember the details, but I suspect it was things like who wrote it? Are the claims cited? Who are they citing? Is it peer reviewed? What is the author trying to convey? What type of language is being used? Who is the target audience? Etc

            • XTL@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Still better than nothing. Although most of those seem to be training people that “who said it” is how truthfulness of a statement should be judged which is exactly backwards.

              • Chiro@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                The value of “who said it” is to help you recognize their motivation. Anyone trying to convince you of something has a vested interest in their position. Understanding the speaker is critical in understanding their position.

              • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                The point is to understand the concept of credibility. Who said it matters. Some people have a demonstrated history if credibility. Some people have a demonstrated history of incredibly.

  • Drasglaf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Great, I’m sure nothing bad is going to come out of this, like everything else deepfake-related.

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Another reason to not post pictures of yourself online unless absolutely necessary. Also upload them in really low quality.

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Presenter: claims there is no 20-minute process to make a video

    Presenter: makes a 20-minute presentation of how to get it set up

    On a more serious note, this is fucking terrifying.

    • JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the fact that it’s in near real time now, older techniques with older hardware would need much longer.

  • Timbo303@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    But Muta, they could do this for a couple years now already thanks to AI.

    Besides the joke above, should the government ban deepfake porn ai or the undress ai? Im suprised it hasnt been banned in many places yet as you can take stock photos of many models and put them up there. Should 100% be illegal as its not consent.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought by now we’d have seen a fuckton of celebrity deepfake nudes and rule 34 porn of every variety, plus apps that let incels create it from pics of their high school crushes/enemies, but it seems like that tidal wave hasn’t hit yet.

    Or perhaps the legal protections arrived just in time to discourage those with the know-how

  • jay@mbin.zerojay.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s one thing to show it off, it’s a whole other to actually show people how to set it up.