I just looked at the campaign to get back in the game nooooooooo

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI is only ethical as a thing available to everyone, free as in libre and used for non-commercial purposes, and it’s generations should have no copyright by default.

    Actually nothing should have copyright, plagiarism is a capitalist lie, sharing knowledge is good and beneficial to society, earning money off of intellectual property is still earning money off property and it’s still bourgeoisie.

    YTers like Hbomberguy are just looking out for his millionaire ass’ financial interests and nothing else, and they use charisma to swindle the proles.

    • thisismyrealname [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      plagiarism is a capitalist lie, sharing knowledge is good and beneficial

      there’s a big difference between “sharing knowledge” and presenting other people’s work as your own

    • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      free as in libre and used for non-commercial purposes, and it’s generations should have no copyright by default.

      this is the only thing i will agree with you on

    • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      and it’s generations should have no copyright by default.

      I’d even take it one step further, if you as a copyright holder use generative AI with that copyright it should be a poison pill that puts every part of that work into the public domain.

      Like if Disney used AI to generate a small part of an intro to a Star Wars tv show should immediately put all of Star Wars into the public domain