• Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh damn, I was expecting this article to go in completely the opposite direction, but this is actually good news! Congrats to all who worked on this.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ugh. How utterly abhorrent that this phenomenon exists. Big congrats to everyone involved in writing and passing this bill!

  • bmsok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve said it before but I’ll say it again. I’ve met Gretchen and her daughters on a few very unofficial occasions. She’s polite, gracious, helpful, and gives zero fucks.

    There was a podcast that was put out last week where she was promoting her book and swearing her motherfucking ass off like a true Michigander. Legend.

    *link: https://youtu.be/x9Ev9QTvy5U?si=bs5pnAfm5wyFObl8

    • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, that’s publicity.

      One of my university peers’ family was friends with Medvedev’s (ex. president of Russia, now the most fascistic freak) family. When he was struggling with exams, Medvedev even wrote him a sweet letter to cheer him up.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    “The law, which will go into effect later this year, will end the practice of judges or juries acquitting defendants facing assault or murder charges if they successfully argue they were provoked by the victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity.”

    Good stuff.

  • MarxMadness
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anyone have a link to the actual bill? Would be interesting to see how this is enforced. A step in the right direction, but how big of a step comes down to that.

      • MarxMadness
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thank you!

        Not bad. It should bar obvious, intentional use of the defense, and more subtle uses or insinuations would be tough to cover under any law. Ideally, judges will enforce it as “we’re not getting into this at all unless you can give a good reason that isn’t prejudicial.”