• originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That bunch of idiots are the ones who control the tanks, artillery, planes, and funding for infrastructure that is required to keep nuclear plants from melting down

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Oh the military did Jan 6? Must have missed that. You know the tanks rolling toward Congress.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The sitting president told… wait for it… A bunch of idiots. I get that you don’t like nuclear, but this is embarrassing.

            • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t dislike nuclear, I dislike bad arguments and bad decision making. The president wields enormous power over the stability and infrastructure required for nuclear to be safe and sustainable. You cannot have watched the debate last night, or the events of Jan 6, and feel confidence that anyone involved can be trusted with a goldfish, much less consistently providing a stable nation capable of securing nuclear plants.

              If your argument is “don’t worry a sitting president may have staged an insurrection, but it was incompetent so it’s totally ok to leave him in charge of nuclear plants” then yeah, I think that’s a bad argument. And embarrassing

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Bad arguments like portraying a bunch of idiots as an actual military force and a war? And you’re still (kinda) at it. Now a strawman. Yup, you’re everything you project about bad arguments. Ciao.

                • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Bad arguments like “the president of the United States tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.” Man the gaslighting from you is wild.

                  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Speaking of strawmans (a weird one at that). And gaslighting. And wild. Projection in case you don’t get it.

                    Why am I bothering. Ciao.