• Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      This goes for most LLM things. The time it takes to get the word calculator to write a letter would have been easily used to just write the damn letter.

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Its doing pretty well when its doing a few words at a time under supervision. Also it does it better than newbies.

        Now if only those people below newbies, those who don’t even bother to learn, didn’t hope to use it to underpay average professionals… And if it wasn’t trained on copyrighted data. And didn’t take up already limited resources like power and water.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think there might be a lot of value in describing it to an AI, though. It takes a fair bit of clarity of thought to get something resembling what you actually want. You could use a junior or rubber duck instead, but the rubber duck doesn’t make stupid assumptions to demonstrate gaps in your thought process, and a junior takes too long and gets demoralized when you have to constantly revise their instructions and iterate over their work.

      Like the output might be garbage, but it might really help you write those stories.

      • Distant_Foreground@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        When I’m struggling with a problem it helps me to explain it to my dog. It’s great for me to hear it out loud and if he’s paying attention, I’ve got a needlessly learned dog!

      • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I love this way of thinking about it.

        I haven’t been interested in AI enough to try writing code with it, but using it as an interactive rubber ducky is a very compelling use case. I might give that a shot.

    • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have a bad habit of jumping into programming without a solid plan which results in lots of rewrites and wasted time. Funnily enough, describing to an AI how I want the code to work forces me to lay out a basic plan and get my thoughts in order which helps me make the final product immensely easier.

      This doesn’t require AI, it just gave me an excuse to do it as a solo actor. I should really do it for more problems because I can wrap my head better thinking in human readable terms rather than thinking about what programming method to use.