‘Lynch calmly responded: “There is plenty of money in the country, it’s just a matter of whether you want to get some of it and distribute it more equitably.”’
is classed as “destroys”. It seems like it’s his standard line. The problem here is that the headline doesn’t deliver and the article is basically a soundbite rather than actual reporting on the “why” part of either statement. It’s frustrating that there’s so much of this clickbait “churn” paraded about as news. We need a better informed and educated population of were to avoid more Brexit style nonsense in future.
I’m not sure:
‘Lynch calmly responded: “There is plenty of money in the country, it’s just a matter of whether you want to get some of it and distribute it more equitably.”’
is classed as “destroys”. It seems like it’s his standard line. The problem here is that the headline doesn’t deliver and the article is basically a soundbite rather than actual reporting on the “why” part of either statement. It’s frustrating that there’s so much of this clickbait “churn” paraded about as news. We need a better informed and educated population of were to avoid more Brexit style nonsense in future.
I agree, but it is the language of the day, and it certainly wasn’t started by a tiny left wing blog .