TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 30 days agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1402arrow-down123
arrow-up1379arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 30 days agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·28 days agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·27 days agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?