Anone heard about it? Anything bad about security?

I’ve checked speeds with my friend, the’re quite good, file transfer speed is insane compared to signal.

  • montar@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Looks like it’s got same problems as Matrix does (despite architecture diffirences).

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        What are the main problems of Matrix? I have searched around for this but not found anything concrete. I use Element with E2EE and haven’t had any real problems with it.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          It supports unencrypted messages. Lots of metadata is not encrypted (eg all reactions).

          Many orgs cant use software where users can send messages unencrypted. Its a security risk, even if the user did it by mistake.

          • Corngood@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think most orgs would want to own the server and for messages to not be end-to-end encrypted. All connections to the server would still be encrypted.

            That would be more in-line with slack or something.

            If you’re referring to federation specifically then that’s going to get pretty complicated with security policies.

      • montar@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean efficient clients that are both easy for non-techy ppl and their 4GB of RAM.