• KrankyKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Can you answer the question, “If you had to choose between saving one human and one hundred rats,which would you choose?” The answer to your questions is related to this one.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not related because that choice is not what is happening. You don’t have one button that kills/saves rats and one that kills/saves a human.

        What is happening is that we have deemed it morall ok to medically experiment on non-human animals but not on humans.

        • KrankyKong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s absolutely related. Animal testing has indirectly saved countless lives. I think you’re refusing to answer because it doesn’t help your argument.

          • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            What argument? I haven’t made an argument, I want to know your position and what it is about humans that makes them more valuable than non-human animals.