• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not planned obsolescence, it’s encroachment on right to repair. I know some states have succeeded in legislation preventing that practice.

    • ☭ Parabola ☭ @lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Making repairs cost so much that it’s less costly to buy the latest product and throw out the old one is a part of planned obsolescence.

        • ☭ Parabola ☭ @lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          In certain cases with certain issues. Keep in mind that your link also contains a long list of “obsolete and vintage” products which they refuse to fully repair if at all.

          Planned obsolescence.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A model becomes vintage six years after Apple discontinues if from the current product line. They discontinue hardware repairs, but continue with software and customer support. After eight years, a product becomes obsolete, and Apple will only provide customer support.

            I’ve worked in the industry for a long time, and I can say that Apple supports their products for longer than their competitors. Their goal is to get people to eventually trade-in their functional device for an upgrade, so they can use the already refined materials in future devices. A loyal customer base is far more important to them than getting a quick buck this time around. They have their ways of making money, just like any other business, but planned obsolescence isn’t one of them.