• Daz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t think a federated wiki is solving any of the problems of wikipedia. You’ve just made a wiki that is more easily spammed and will have very few contributors. Yes, Wikipedia is centralized, but it’s a good thing. No one has to chase down the just perfect wikipedia site to find general information, just the one. The negative of wikipedia is more its sometimes questionable moderation and how its english-centric. This has more to do with fundamentally unequal internet infrastructure in most countries than anything though. Imperialism holds back tech.

    I agree that it might be fine for niche wikis but again, why in the world would you ever want your niche wiki federated? Sounds like a tech solution looking for the wrong problem.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      sometimes questionable moderation

      That’s one way of putting it. Another way is “ramrodding the narratives of anglo chauvinists that are to the right of even the neoliberal historical consensus”.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Arguably even Fandom / Wikia is ruined by plain old greed more than centralization. What’s wrong with it isn’t content, it’s the fact every page loads seven ads, a roll of clickbait, and a goddamn Discord server. A weird blog site for editable text and tiny images would work fine if it wasn’t twisted to feed Engagemagog.