• Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    If it’s weight divided by happiness, it should spike to infinity instead of dropping to zero

    • knorke3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      i believe as the turkey does not feel any happiness it should be either 0 or undefined, resulting in the function being undefined beyond death either way.

      • Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        True. If it realizes death is iminent, it spikes as this will, at some scale, still be a gradual process where happiness approaches zero before actually reaching it. If not, it stays wherever it would normally be in those instances. Starting at the moment of death, undefined.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Solid analysis especially considering what the artist thought they could slip past us: turkeys getting a little bit happier every day from birth to death.

          • knorke3@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            where do you get that from? as far as i can tell, the only conclusion fro that part of the graph is that the turkey, on average, gains weight faster than happiness, though the exact relation of the two beyond that is unknown unless the weight curve is known. i would actually argue that it’s losing happiness at the end as the weight curve should start to flatten out, yet the displayed curve doesn’t follow that expectation.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m reading it as “Weight & Happiness” rather than “Weight ÷ Happiness”… perhaps a bad assumption.

              • knorke3@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                “weight or happiness” i would understand as that is another established interpretation of a slash - “weight and happiness” though is, in my opinion, actually incorrect. in that case it would have been “weight + happiness”

      • Starbaba@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I believe the slash is being used to mean “or”, rather than as a division sign.

      • MeowZedong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Alternatively, as happiness goes to zero, the weight will remain constant until cooking, so after the surprise, the line should go to infinity until cooking.

        Edit: aww, fuck. Someone else already said it. I’m 5 days late.

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Getting a free-range, heritage turkey from a local farm is well-worth it, if it is affordable (or you can pool money to make it affordable). You can genuinely taste a significant difference. Not only do they grow for a longer period and get a more varied diet but they have a less stressful, happier life with more experiences. I think that the happiness makes them taste better.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Upvote for sourcing properly, even though I don’t really agree with the contents of the source, it makes the joke a lot funnier.