• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I imagine the idea here would be for long term storage, so you’d still use faster media day to day, and then dump things there as an archive.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      sure, but if your write speed is 1gb/day in your new nanoscale thing, its not going to work at scale.

      thats why i was looking for any write speed on this new tech, and i havent found it yet.

      • MinekPo1 [it/she]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        autistic complaining

        honestly I don’t even know how to interpret ~11.5 μg b/s (micro gram bits per second).

        Seriously I get not liking capital letters , but like ESPECIALLY in this case (as ~11.5 b/s and ~11.5 B/s are about as reasonable) , capitalize your units ! also differentiate between GiB (gigi bits) and GB (giga bits).

        to be fair , because g and b are not separated by a space , “×” or “•” , g should be interpreted as a prefix , according to SI rules , but its not something most people know about and g is not a valid SI prefix .

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah that’s true, there’s a minimum write speed you have to achieve if it’s going to be at all useful. And to be fair, a lot of this tech never hits the market because it’s hard to scale from lab to production, or just not cost effective enough to produce at scale. Still good to see people researching this stuff though.