• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes, and it fucking sucks. It’s a great thing to lint for but it makes debugging such a pain - commenting out an irrelevant block to focus your debugging will sometimes break your ability to compile… it’s extremely jarring.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Making a variable just to hold a debug value to look at with a breakpoint, but Go says no.

    • technojamin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is why many languages have errors and warnings as separate things. Errors for things that for sure prevent the program from working, and warnings for things that are probably wrong but don’t prevent things from working. If you have a setting to then treat warnings as errors (like for CI checks), then you get all the guarantees and none of the frustration.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Have they given an explanation as to why that is? I mean why make it a fatal error that prevents compilation, when you could make it a warning and have the compiler simply skip it?

      • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Its an effort to keep large code bases clean. I think they should allow them when running go run but not when building.

        • RustyNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I can see the sentiment here… Going through 100 clippy warning on Rust is just not fun… I know there’s the good old clippy --fix but I’m paranoid it breaks my code accidentally.

          Could probably have a compromise like 5 unused variables and your code don’t compile

          • Faresh@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            but I’m paranoid it breaks my code accidentally

            Automated tests and version control should prevent that from being a problem, I imagine.

        • Ethan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I totally agree that it’s really annoying when debugging, but go run literally builds then executes. I think what they should do is add a build flag. So debug builds can pass that flag to get the builder to shut up, and leave it those errors enabled for production builds.

        • expr@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Or, you know, treat it as a warning like literally every other language. There’s absolutely no good reason for it to prevent a build outright, but then again, there’s not really good reasons for many of the decisions behind go.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Keep in mind that this is the same language that prefers function names ToBeLikeThis(), and the reason is that it looks different than Java.

        • fadhl3y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Every time I think “perhaps I should give Golang another try”, it’s shit like this that keeps me noping out

          • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s two types of programming languages, the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses. Go is still my most productive language and is killer for building webservers. I basically use it as a scripting language since it’s so fast to write, compile, and execute.