• Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    A bunch of environmental destruction comes from industrial farming too, though, so overall no farmers would be a net positive for the environment.

      • Xavienth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Living in a city is better for the environment than living in a rural community. Many efficiencies to be gained by having things close together. Less land use, less pollution (yes, really), less energy use, fewer resources to spend on infrastructure.

        Cities are good for the environment unless the alternative is killing their inhabitants. But i should hope we’re not advocating for that.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Wow, hot take. I imagine you’re the first person in the lineup to starve to death, ahead of all those brown folks, eh.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh you’re spicy. Did you think I actually believe we should all just lie down and die? Like yeah I have days where that’s pretty high on my agenda, but I definitely prefer the current status quo of us slowly extinguishing ourselves in a hell of our own making. xoxo