• infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    improve-society “We have been implicitly accepting the idea of ‘nobility’ that has no demonstrable empirical basis in reality.”

    very-intelligent “People are better at different things. Some people are fit to rule, others are fit to put together cathedrals.”

    • CannotSleep420
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      When we say that experience and reason prove that men are not equal, we mean by equality, equality in abilities or similarity in physical strength and mental ability.

      It goes without saying that in this respect men are not equal. No sensible person and no socialist forgets this. But this kind of equality has nothing whatever to do with socialism.

      V. I. Lenin, someone who implicitly accepted the idea of nobility.

      • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Can you point out where in my comment(s) that I made any assertion at all of congruency amongst humans?

        I am making an argument about class and how we think of class. I am saying that the synthetic idea of “leadership” (as opposed to its standalone components) underlies the structure of class society.

        Also, physical aptitude is multiple things, and mental ability is multiple things. But I’d give Lenin a free pass on that one because psychology, physiology, and kinesiology were much more rudimentary back then.

        • CannotSleep420
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          After actually thinking this through, I can see that you are right. “Leadership” is only harped on about by authoritarians and is only useful for stifling non-hierarchical organization structures.