• Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not like threatening the writers’ kids would have been reasonable either

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I wouldn’t expect logical thinking to be a strong characteristic in someone who’d threaten kids over a videogame.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              OK, so let’s assume that’s a good faith literal interpretation.

              Let’s try it this way.

              Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren’t generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

              I could however be wrong in this generalisation given I only have my experience to go on, if your experience leads you to believe people who threaten kids over videogames are not running with a logic deficit then your statement makes sense I suppose.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren’t generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

                You’re just repeating yourself.

                “Logical” is not a binary position. It’s a spectrum.

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  So, not a good faith take then, oh well.

                  “Logical” is not a binary position. It’s a spectrum.

                  Agreed, not sure how it’s relevant but it seems we agree on something after all.

                  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Ah yes “bad faith”. Right up there next to the Strawman in “Don’t actually have any argument to put forward for $500, Alex”.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Consider the average person’s intelligence. Then realize half (or so) are stupider than that.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a couple of actors in my province that had a hard time finding work after playing a certain role because people were mad at them personally and producers didn’t want to touch them with a 10’ pole!

    • Willie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because writing has no face, you can’t show writing how much you hate it, because it doesn’t change and has no feelings. Meanwhile an actor does. It’s just stupid emotional stuff.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      TBF, she did go on a tirad against players when the game was getting ciriticized. I found it weird that she took the criticism of the game’s writing so personally despite her not being one of the writers.

      Keep in mind that I’m not excusing the death theats. That shit isn’t okay. I’m just pointing out why she may have been targeted for harassment.