BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoNew gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square300fedilinkarrow-up1604arrow-down1108
arrow-up1496arrow-down1imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square300fedilink
minus-squarebanneryear1868@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·5 months agoFT is pretty solid when it comes to data analysis like this. The point is to show a specific trend not to encompass all the data in the sources.
minus-squarePoplar?@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 months agoI think they understood “liberal” to mean “classical liberal” which obviously would have the issue they point out. But FT seems to be using “liberal” to mean “progressive” or something like that.
FT is pretty solid when it comes to data analysis like this. The point is to show a specific trend not to encompass all the data in the sources.
I think they understood “liberal” to mean “classical liberal” which obviously would have the issue they point out. But FT seems to be using “liberal” to mean “progressive” or something like that.