• Odinkirk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is not a trolley problem in that there is sequence involved:

    1: Tuvok and Neelix alive before transport

    2: Tuvok and Neelix dead and a new rational being in their place. This being had a moral blank slate and are thus blameless for the circumstances of creation.

    3: Janeway decides that the speech she gave to the Vidiians was just hot air and that she will kill Tuvix to get the original two back. (Non lethal ways were explored, but quickly abandoned)

    4: The blameless being makes an articulate case for their life, and even addresses the “needs of the many” argument by stating the truth: the other two are gone and the new being is there. (Raw, unalloyed utilitarianism is problematic at best, just ask the people of Omelas Majalis)

    5: The doctor straight up says that the procedure is unethical and refuses to do it.

    6: Janeway does it anyway.

    Calling it a trolley problem is reductive and inaccurate.

    (Edited for typo.)

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago
      1. The doctor has his ethical subroutines preventing him from doing harm.

      That is fine in a doctor/patient relationship, but the captain has a captain/crew relationship, she would cause a lot of harm and loose two good crew members if she had let it be.

      • Odinkirk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The two crew members that were lost at the same time Tuvix appeared? The dead (not alive) ones? And again, square this with the speech she gave the Vidiians.

        If you’re going to refute, then address the whole thing.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The way I see it, the crewmembers didn’t die, they merged, Tuvix is the result of a treatable condition.

          • Odinkirk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I understand but disagree with that perspective. To me they were not alive at the time. However, you still haven’t accounted for the rest. Reconcile the Majalis problem and Janeway’s own speech to the Vidiians.

    • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      even addresses the “needs of the many” argument by stating the truth: the other two are gone and the new being is there.

      articulate case for their life, and even addresses the “needs of the many” argument by stating the truth: the other two are gone and the new being is there

      That only addresses the needs of Tuvok and Neelix. What about the rest of the crew whose chances of survival and reaching home are materially hindered by the effective loss of a crew member. Presumably Tuvix isn’t going to work 8 hours in the galley then straight away 8 hours on tactical. What if there’s an emergency that needs both skillets at the same time? What if Tuvix is killed in six months time on an away mission?

      It’s true that Tuvok and Neelix were gone, but the option now existed to have them both back. So the fact that they were gone is reductive and inaccurate. Again ultimately Janeway has around 150 lives to think of, not just three.

      The doctor straight up says that the procedure is unethical and refuses to do it.

      Because he’s a doctor. I doubt he’d be able to order someone into a jefferies tube to fix an ODN conduit in an active warp plasma shaft. Yet that’s literally part of the bridge officers test. https://youtu.be/rC6rGoyEe2s?si=ho_FOBjSaUdTRurX

      • Odinkirk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Janeway’s own log started that Tuvix was better than the sun of the parts; a better cook and tactical officer. The point of a team is that no one person is a point of failure. Factoring in a hypothetical future scenario is spurious.

        An extrajudicial execution (to be charitable) for no crime is beyond most ethical frameworks.

        And not one person has even tried to reconcile the speech to the Vidiians.

        • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The point of a team is that no one person is a point of failure.

          Exactly. Tuvix is a potential single point of failure. You’re doubling your risk. Eggs and baskets.

          Factoring in a hypothetical future scenario is spurious.

          Why? It goes hand in hand with your point about points of failure. It’s something that would have had to be considered. Voyager wasn’t snug and safe in the alpha quadrant where they could just go to a starbase and get more crew members if they lost any.

          And not one person has even tried to reconcile the speech to the Vidiians.

          It’s right there in the speech I will do whatever is necessary to protect my people

          At the end of the day the murder of Tuvix pales into insignificance compared to her out and out genocide of the Borg. All to protect her people and get them home.


          I don’t personally think the murder of Tuvix was justifiable, but it’s definitely not an open and shut case. Janeway had to consider 150 people and their chances of surviving and getting home in one piece she also had to consider Tuvok and Neelix.

          • Odinkirk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Were we watching the same speech? The one where she condemns them, but states that she doesn’t have the freedom to kill someone that another might live (in this scenario, killing an alien for the sake of a crewman) and ultimately decides to turn them loose with a promise of reprisal if encountered again?